Reglamento General ACES América

Edition Julio 2026 · in force since July 18, 2026
Change history
  • Julio 2026 · Jul 18, 2026Harmonisation of the articles and Appendix VIII in accordance with the decision consultation of July 2026: penalty under Art. 27.2 (graduated table of Appendix VIII); City fee €2,500; Capital requirement "capital of a country"; Evaluation Committee of 5-9 for Capital and 3-6 for Community-Island and City; twelve criteria (Appendix I); 50% rule transferred to Art. 8; reference in Art. 23.1 corrected to Article 5; correction of references to Europe (Appendices IV, VI, VII and VIII); restoration of the Appendix V heading; correction of typographical errors and unification of "ACES América". Incorporation of Appendix X: ACES Programme for International Promotion, Technical Consultancy and Institutional Quality (appendix to Article 26), approved in July 2026.Affected articles: Art. 27.2, 22, 16, 8, 23.1; Anexos I, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, X
  • Mayo 2026 · May 12, 2026Añadida al Art. 26.4 la cláusula de pago con recursos propios (la entidad puede pagar los derechos de imagen con recursos públicos propios sin firmar el convenio de patrocinio) y la nota al pie de traducción del reglamento oficial europeo.Affected articles: 26.4
  • Enero 2026 · Jan 1, 2026Edición inicial.
The regulation is currently available in Spanish only. Translations are on the way.

Search runs on the Spanish text, even when you read the regulations in another language.

Contents

Title II · On the Evaluation Committee

8. Composition of the Evaluation Committee.

Specific to Región: Comité de 5-7 miembros (art. 8.1e).
  1. Number of members of the Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committees for cities bidding for American Capital of Sport shall be composed of a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 9 members.

Specific requirements for Communities / Cities / Towns / Regions / Islands:

  • 1b. For the evaluation of Community-Islands, the evaluation committees shall be composed of a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 6 members.
  • 1c. For the evaluation of Cities, the evaluation committees shall be composed of a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 6 members.
  • 1d. For the evaluation of Towns, the evaluation committees shall be composed of a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 members.
  • 1e. For the evaluation of Regions, the evaluation committees shall be composed of a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 7 members.

Members of the Evaluation Committees of two cities competing for the American Capital of Sport award. The Evaluation Committees of cities competing for the American Capital of Sport award for the same year shall have at least 40% of members participating in both visits to the competing cities, in order to achieve the greatest homogeneity and objectivity in the scores awarded.

Where two candidacies compete for the same award other than that of Capital, at least 50% of the members of the Evaluation Committee shall participate in both visits.

9. Criteria for membership of the Evaluation Committee.

The members of the Evaluation Committee must have proven experience in the field of sport, whether in the public sphere or in private enterprise. Such experience may be evidenced by professional experience in public office in city councils or other national or international public or private bodies, membership of associations linked to the world of sport, professional involvement in sport-related companies, or the professional practice of a sporting discipline, at present or in the past.


Title III · On the members of the Evaluation Committee

10. Selection of the members of the Evaluation Committee.

The selection of the members of the Evaluation Committee shall be carried out by the Board of Directors of ACES America on the basis of the criteria it deems most appropriate, seeking diversity of profiles and preventing conflicts of interest from arising. In this way, the objectivity of the evaluation process is strengthened.

11. Criteria for exercising the right to vote.

  1. In order to exercise their right to vote, each member of the Evaluation Committee must be free from any conflict of interest among those included in Article 12 and other articles of these Regulations.

  2. Exercising the right to vote requires full knowledge of what is being evaluated. Therefore, in order for a Committee member to exercise their right to vote, they must be present at all the events held during the visits to cities bidding for American Capital of Sport. The content of the visits to candidate cities is specified in Appendix I of these Regulations.

References in this article

12. Conflicts of interest. Situations that may be regarded as a conflict of interest.

Specific to Región: La misma nacionalidad que el municipio evaluado NO se considera conflicto de interés (art. 12.5).
  1. The members of the Evaluation Committee shall act loyally in the performance of their duties, guided solely by the purpose and objectives entailed in being a Committee member, which is none other than to select the municipality presenting sufficient merits to be granted the award of American Capital/Region/City/Town of Sport, endeavouring at all times to avoid situations that could entail a conflict of interest.

  2. The members of the Evaluation Committee shall at all times be prohibited from using their position to obtain personal benefits beyond their duties as members of the Evaluation Committee.

  3. A conflict of interest may exist where a member of the Evaluation Committee, at the time of exercising their right to vote as such — that is, by assigning a score to the candidate municipality — may have some kind of relationship, whether personal or financial in nature, that could in any way influence their objectivity.

  4. The giving of presents, gifts, services or any other benefits from any person or institution directly or indirectly related to the municipality submitting its candidacy, which could compromise the objectivity of any of the members of the Evaluation Committee, constitutes a situation liable to generate a conflict of interest. The members of the Evaluation Committee may not accept gifts from the candidate city other than tokens of mere institutional courtesy.

  5. Other situations that may give rise to a conflict of interest are the following:

  • a) Sharing the same locality or region as the city being evaluated.
  • b) Belonging to an ACES America delegation in which the city being evaluated is enrolled, regardless of the nationality of the candidate city.
  • c) Having any economic or personal interest beyond the relationship that may exist through ACES America.

Specific requirements for Communities/Cities/Towns/Regions concerning Article 12.5: In the case of Evaluation Committees for Community-Islands/Cities/Towns/Regions, sharing the same nationality as the municipality being evaluated shall not be regarded as a conflict of interest.

13. Conflicts of interest. Course of action.

In the event of a conflict of interest*, the affected member of the Evaluation Committee has the duty to report that circumstance to the Board of Directors of ACES America and to refrain at all times from intervening or participating, directly or indirectly, in the agreements or decisions adopted by it, particularly with regard to the voting process for the candidate municipality.

* A personal conflict of interest is a situation in which a person's private interests, such as outside professional relationships or personal financial assets, interfere — or may be perceived to interfere — with the performance of their duties as a member of the Evaluation Committee.

14. Duty of secrecy and discretion.

  1. The members of the Evaluation Committee must at all times maintain standards of prudence consistent with their role as regards the duty of secrecy and discretion. They shall therefore be required at all times to keep secret the deliberations or opinions, their own or those of others, that take place during the evaluation process of the candidate city.

  2. The duty of secrecy and discretion must be maintained even after the evaluation process of the candidate cities has concluded and the award has been granted. The duty of secrecy and discretion must also be maintained even if a Committee member ends their relationship with ACES America.


Fees, deadlines and requirements

Choose an award to see what it requires and what it costs.

Application fee

  • Fee de candidatura (>100 municipios)(22.1)12,000 €
  • Fee de candidatura (<100 municipios)(22.1)6,000 €

Image rights

  • Capital-Island +500k hab.(26.4)38,000 €
  • 250.000+ hab.(26.4)15,000 €
  • 100.000+ hab.(26.4)10,000 €
  • 50.000-99.999 hab.(26.4)7,000 €
  • 25.000-49.999 hab.(26.4)5,000 €
  • 20.000-24.999 hab.(26.4)3,000 €
  • Menos de 19.999 hab.(26.4)1,500 €
  • Región 100+ municipios(26.4)38,000 €
  • Región <100 municipios(26.4)19,000 €

Annual network fee

  • Cuota anual de red (Ciudades y Comunidades/Islas/Regiones)(28)1,000 €

Population requirements

  • Requisito de composición(16 / Anexo VIII)Sin límite de habitantes; estructuras unidas por afinidad; una sola Región por país

Evaluation committee

  • Tamaño del Comité(8.1)5-7 miembros
  • Participación en ambas visitas (no-Capital)(8.2 / Anexo VIII)El 50 % de los miembros del comité participa en ambas visitas cuando compiten dos candidatas (Comunidad, Ciudad y Municipio)

Minimum score

  • Nota mínima para acceder al galardón(Anexo II)7.5 / 10

Penalty

Calendar

  • Fin de envío de la carta del alcalde/sa(15)30 de marzo del año anterior a la candidatura
  • Elaboración del expediente de candidatura(15)1 de abril - 30 de junio
  • Comunicación de los dos finalistas(15)antes del 31 de julio
  • Visitas a las ciudades(15)preferentemente octubre
  • Anuncio de ganadores (gala anual)(15)noviembre / diciembre
  • Máximo de candidatos admitidos(15)5 candidates

Other data

  • Tope de regalos a evaluadores(20)100 USD
  • Billetes de avión cubiertos (Ciudad/Municipio/Región)(20)3 flights
  • Espera para recandidatura tras ganar(21.3)10 years
  • Recandidatura tras no ganar(21.1)Desde el año siguiente
  • Preaviso del resultado antes de la gala(24.2)2 weeks
  • Aviso de instalaciones a visitar(18.2)1 month
  • Instalaciones designadas por ACES (resto)(18.2)1 facilities
  • Duración de la visita(Anexo I / Anexo VIII)4 días (Capital y Región); 3 días (Comunidad/Ciudad); 2 días (Municipio)
  • Duración de la votación(Anexo I)1.5 hours
  • Número de criterios de evaluación(6 / Anexo I / Anexo II)12 criterios